179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] good labels (was Re: [idm] a successor to autechre?)

4 messages · 4 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: a successor to autechre? · good labels (was re: [idm] a successor to autechre?)
2000-05-09 20:04Re: [idm] a successor to autechre?
├─ 2000-05-09 20:59Circumflex Re: [idm] a successor to autechre?
└─ 2000-05-09 21:58alan r lucas [idm] good labels (was Re: [idm] a successor to autechre?)
2000-05-10 00:54O'Neill [idm] Fw: [idm] good labels (was Re: [idm] a successor to autechre?)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2000-05-09 20:04Cichli@aol.comsuccessor to autechre? i'm not sure if it's even possible, because the impact they have ha
From:
To:
Date:
Tue, 9 May 2000 16:04:53 EDT
Subject:
Re: [idm] a successor to autechre?
permalink · <3a.4e11322.2649c965@aol.com>
successor to autechre? i'm not sure if it's even possible, because the impact they have had on IDM is not going to be matched in any way. someone who takes IDM in a completely different direction could possibly happen. there is a huge IDM internet culture right now. like you said, lots of small labels, though the content isn't very good with most of them. the only artists i think could have as big of an impact as autechre (excluding my own work of course, hehe) is a group called EU. i don't know if any of you are familiar with them (since i am new to the list), but they are these two russian guys who have a good bit of stuff up at mp3.com, and it is like you said, out of left field. you can tell there is an IDM influence, but it doesnt sound anything like autechre or aphex ar whatever. they call it experimental hip-hop or something, but it's nothing like that really. their beats and timing is disjointed and their melodies also are all over the place. you'd have to hear it for yrself. but i personally think it has the potential of being great stuff. i try to create original music of course, and i think it is usually pretty creative. but everyone else thinks their own music is great, so that's not saying much. as for BoC....i don't think they're special at all. a few songs are kinda cool, but that's it. i know a lot of people like them a lot though, so maybe i'm missing something. as for people listening to labels instead of individual artists, i dont see that happening. there have always been some people who do that, but i don't see the majority doing it, basically because for a label to be consistently great is not common. that's all i'll ramble about for now. cool list btw. :jason (ecux www.zenapolae.com) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-05-09 20:59Circumflexon 5/9/00 4:04 PM, Cichli@aol.com wrote: > successor to autechre? i'm not sure if it's eve
From:
Circumflex
To:
Date:
Tue, 09 May 2000 16:59:16 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] a successor to autechre?
Reply to:
Re: [idm] a successor to autechre?
permalink · <B53DF464.136E%circumflex@mac.com>
on 5/9/00 4:04 PM, Cichli@aol.com wrote:
quoted 1 line successor to autechre? i'm not sure if it's even possible> successor to autechre? i'm not sure if it's even possible
Agreed, but AFAICT, in this thread the word "successor" is defined as the list's focus of discussion. If that's the case, then a successor is on the way (I know I'm tired of hearing/talking about Ae).
quoted 5 lines the only artists i think could have as big of an impact as autechre> the only artists i think could have as big of an impact as autechre > (excluding my own work of course, hehe) is a group called EU. i don't know > if any of you are familiar with them (since i am new to the list), but they > are these two russian guys who have a good bit of stuff up at mp3.com, and it > is like you said, out of left field.
Cool, I'll have to check this out. Thank for the suggestion.
quoted 4 lines as for people listening to labels instead of> as for people listening to labels instead of > individual artists, i dont see that happening. there have always been some > people who do that, but i don't see the majority doing it, basically because > for a label to be consistently great is not common.
This is (especially) true with one of the great electronic labels of our time, Fax. Sometimes a release will come out of Fax and be incredible, and then something like Jet Chamber 5 slides by. I'll argue that the idea that some unknown artist will come out of left field is as probable as Namlook emerging again right from beneath our noses to be the IDM god for the double aughts. Has anyone here ever heard Solarized by Namlook? It's an IDM opus. And, *imho*, Ozoona (Namlook and Gordon together like chocolate and peanut butter) has replaced Balil's Parasight as the optimal IDM record. Fax is supposed to be an ambient label, but IDM abounds in its ranks and Namlook is at the helm. Btw, this is all pure subjective opinion representing my individual tastes. Take it or leave it. Now, back to lurking... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-05-09 21:58alan r lucaslabels that usually put out good stuff: warp (i know some people are prolly screaming abou
From:
alan r lucas
To:
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 9 May 2000 17:58:46 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
[idm] good labels (was Re: [idm] a successor to autechre?)
Reply to:
Re: [idm] a successor to autechre?
permalink · <Pine.BSI.4.02.10005091753110.1674-100000@frogger.telerama.com>
labels that usually put out good stuff: warp (i know some people are prolly screaming about that, but it's still true, whether it's a new signing or not. and the vlad disc is a new signing *and* good!) worm interface - everything i've picked up from them has been really good. i was really really impressed with fort lauderdale's "1001 revolutions". anyone have any info on these guys? picked it up solely on WI's good name. ummm... there are others, but these two are right on the top of my head, and i buy most of what they both put out these days. and the recent planet mu stuff that i've picked up has been really good - frost jockey and the new kid spatula disc is awesome. best stuff i've heard from mike p in awhile. On Tue, 9 May 2000 Cichli@aol.com wrote:
quoted 4 lines maybe i'm missing something. as for people listening to labels instead of> maybe i'm missing something. as for people listening to labels instead of > individual artists, i dont see that happening. there have always been some > people who do that, but i don't see the majority doing it, basically because > for a label to be consistently great is not common.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-05-10 00:54O'Neill---------- > From: O'Neill <goneill@iol.ie> > To: alan r lucas <alucas@telerama.com> > Sub
From:
O'Neill
To:
Date:
Wed, 10 May 2000 01:54:58 +0100
Subject:
[idm] Fw: [idm] good labels (was Re: [idm] a successor to autechre?)
permalink · <200005100049.BAA65329@mail.iol.ie>
----------
quoted 6 lines From: O'Neill <goneill@iol.ie>> From: O'Neill <goneill@iol.ie> > To: alan r lucas <alucas@telerama.com> > Subject: Re: [idm] good labels (was Re: [idm] a successor to autechre?) > Date: 10 May 2000 01:53 > > the vast majority of soma stuff is great another label glasgow
underground
quoted 13 lines is also consistantly good,coincidentally both labels are scottish. Filter> is also consistantly good,coincidentally both labels are scottish. Filter > is another great label with really good jazzy and deep electronica > > ---------- > > From: alan r lucas <alucas@telerama.com> > > To: Cichli@aol.com > > Cc: idm@hyperreal.org > > Subject: [idm] good labels (was Re: [idm] a successor to autechre?) > > Date: 09 May 2000 22:58 > > > > labels that usually put out good stuff: > > > > warp (i know some people are prolly screaming about that, but it's
still
quoted 6 lines true, whether it's a new signing or not. and the vlad disc is a new> > true, whether it's a new signing or not. and the vlad disc is a new > > signing *and* good!) > > > > worm interface - everything i've picked up from them has been really > good. > > i was really really impressed with fort lauderdale's "1001
revolutions".
quoted 4 lines anyone have any info on these guys? picked it up solely on WI's good> > anyone have any info on these guys? picked it up solely on WI's good > name. > > > > ummm... there are others, but these two are right on the top of my
head,
quoted 3 lines and i buy most of what they both put out these days. and the recent> > and i buy most of what they both put out these days. and the recent > planet > > mu stuff that i've picked up has been really good - frost jockey and
the
quoted 8 lines new kid spatula disc is awesome. best stuff i've heard from mike p in> > new kid spatula disc is awesome. best stuff i've heard from mike p in > > awhile. > > > > On Tue, 9 May 2000 Cichli@aol.com wrote: > > > > > maybe i'm missing something. as for people listening to labels > instead of > > > individual artists, i dont see that happening. there have always
been
quoted 10 lines some> some > > > people who do that, but i don't see the majority doing it, basically > because > > > for a label to be consistently great is not common. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org